No. The meta keywords tag does not help your SEO, and it has not helped since 2009. Google ignores it, Bing treats it as a possible spam signal, and the only person who reliably reads it is a competitor checking your page source for your keyword list.
That is the whole answer. If you came here to find out whether you should fill in a "meta keywords" box, the answer is don't bother, and the rest of this explains why and what to do with that time instead.
What is the meta keywords tag?
Picture a bakery owner setting up a new website. The page builder shows a field called "Meta Keywords," so she types in everything she sells: "birthday cakes, cupcakes, wedding cakes, bakery near me." It feels productive. It looks like SEO. It does nothing.
That field writes a single hidden line into the code of the page. It looks like this: a `<meta name="keywords">` tag holding a comma-separated list of words. Nobody visiting the site ever sees it. It sits in the page source, invisible to customers, and was meant to tell search engines what the page was about.
Here is the part that trips people up. The meta keywords tag is not the same as the meta description. The meta description is the sentence of text that shows up under your blue link in the search results, the bit a person actually reads before deciding to click. That one still matters, and we will get to it. The keywords tag is the old hidden list. Two different things, with two very different fates.
Do meta keywords still matter for SEO?
They do not. Google does not use them, full stop.
You do not have to take my word for it. Google said it in plain English. In a 2009 Search Central post titled "Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking," the company stated directly that it does not use the keywords meta tag in web search ranking. Not "uses it a little." Not "depends." Does not use it.
The same week, Matt Cutts, who ran Google's webspam team at the time, confirmed it in a post and a short video: "Google doesn't use the keywords meta tag in our web search ranking." So the answer has been public, on the record, and unchanged for over fifteen years.
It is also still true today. Google's current documentation on the meta tags it supports lists every tag Google pays attention to, and the keywords tag is not on it. A tag Google does not recognize cannot affect your indexing or your ranking. Our bakery owner's tidy list of cakes is, as far as Google is concerned, a comment written in invisible ink.
Why did Google stop using them?
Because the tag got gamed into uselessness.
The idea was reasonable at the start: let a site tell the search engine its topics. The problem is that the list is hidden, so there was no cost to lying. A page about used cars could quietly stuff the keywords tag with "free iPhone, weight loss, cheap flights" and try to show up for all of it. When the signal is invisible and easy to fake, it stops being a signal. Spammers wore it out for everyone.
So Google dropped it as a ranking input. Search Engine Journal's analysis of ranking factors reaches the same conclusion plainly: the meta keywords tag is not a Google ranking factor, and the advice is to spend that effort on your title tags and meta descriptions instead. The tag did not get more useful over time. It got abandoned, on purpose, for a good reason.
Can filling it in ever hurt you?
It can, in two quiet ways, which is why "harmless waste of time" undersells it.
The first is Bing. Search Engine Land reported that while Bing technically still looks at the meta keywords tag, it treats it as a spam signal rather than a positive one, and the piece concluded bluntly that only spammers should use it. Read that again. The tag is not neutral on Bing. Stuffing it is the kind of thing low-quality sites do, and looking like a low-quality site is the opposite of what you want.
The second is simpler and almost funny. The tag is hidden from customers but not from competitors. Anyone can right-click your page, view the source, and read your keywords list in five seconds. So when the bakery owner types "birthday cakes, cupcakes, wedding cakes, bakery near me," she gets zero ranking benefit and hands the exact terms she is targeting to the bakery across town. You did the keyword research. They got the answer key for free.
The honest industry verdict on this is old and clear. Search Engine Land columnist Danny Sullivan documented Bing's own position, drawn from a statement by then-Bing product manager Duane Forrester, that the keywords tag is at best a minor spam signal, and he titled the piece "The Meta Keywords Tag Lives At Bing & Why Only Spammers Should Use It." A first-hand industry verdict, framed honestly: filling in the tag is at best wasted effort and at worst a red flag.
What about Bing, Yandex, and your own site search?
This is where people look for a loophole, so let me close it.
Bing we covered: it reads the tag, but as a possible spam flag, not a boost. That is a reason to leave it empty, not a reason to fill it. Yandex, the big Russian engine, has at times paid some attention to the tag, but unless your customers are searching in Russian, that is not your audience and not your concern. A bakery in Manchester is not optimizing for Yandex.
There is one genuinely fair use, and it has nothing to do with Google. Some internal site-search tools, the search box on your own website, can be configured to read the keywords field to help return better results inside your site. That is a tool you control, for visitors already on your page. It is not SEO, and it does not move you up in Google. If a plugin uses the field that way, fine. Just do not confuse it with ranking.
What actually moves the needle instead?
The same words. Different places. That is the whole trick.
The bakery owner's instinct was right. "Birthday cakes," "wedding cakes," and "bakery near me" are exactly the terms her customers type. She just put them in the one box where they do nothing. Move those words into the places a person and a search engine both actually read, and they start earning clicks. Three places do the heavy lifting.
The page title is first. This is the bold blue line in the search results, and it is a real ranking factor. "Birthday & Wedding Cakes in Leeds | Sweet Street Bakery" tells Google what the page is and tells a person it is for them. Put your strongest, truest keyword here.
The meta description is second. This is the one piece of "meta" worth your time, and it works differently from the keywords tag. Google has said the meta description is not a ranking factor, but it is used to generate the snippet shown under your link, and that snippet drives whether people click. As Search Engine Journal notes, citing Google: "we still don't use the description meta tag in our ranking," yet it is what fills the result a searcher reads. Write a clear sentence that makes the right person want to click. That is its whole job.
Your real page content is third, and biggest. Write the way your customers talk. If they search "wedding cake tasting near me," say "book a free wedding cake tasting" on the page, in words a human reads. Google ranks pages on the visible content far more than on any tag, and the words your customers use belong in your headings, your copy, and your answers to their questions.
Notice the pattern. The keywords tag hid your words from customers and gave them to rivals. Titles, snippets, and copy show your words to customers and put them to work. Same vocabulary, opposite outcome, decided entirely by where you put it.
What should you do today?
A short checklist, in order.
First, find your meta keywords tag. If you use WordPress with an old SEO plugin, or a dated theme, there may be a "Meta Keywords" field quietly filling itself in. Leave it blank. Clearing it costs you nothing and removes a tiny spam risk.
Second, write one strong page title for each important page, with the real term a customer would search and your town or area in it.
Third, write one honest meta description per page, a single sentence that earns the click. Treat it as ad copy for your blue link, not as a place to list words.
Fourth, put the phrases your customers actually use into the visible page itself. Headings, body copy, the answers to the questions they ask you on the phone.
That is the entire job. No hidden tag. No keyword stuffing. No homework for your competitors.
Frequently asked questions
Should I delete the meta keywords tag if my site already has one?
You do not have to delete it for Google's sake, since Google ignores it either way, but leaving it empty is the safer choice. An empty or absent tag carries zero spam risk on Bing and gives competitors nothing to read. If your plugin keeps auto-filling it, turn that setting off.
Is the meta keywords tag the same as keywords in my content?
No, and this is the key mix-up. The meta keywords tag is a hidden code field that Google ignores. "Keywords in your content" means the real words on your visible page, in your titles and copy, which Google very much does read. Same words, but only one location actually helps you.
Do meta descriptions still matter, or are they dead too?
Meta descriptions still matter, just not for ranking. Google has said it does not use the description in ranking, but it often uses it to build the snippet under your link, and a good snippet gets more people to click. So write it for the human reader, not for the algorithm.
Will filling in meta keywords get my site penalized?
You are very unlikely to be penalized just for having the tag. The realistic downsides are smaller and quieter: it does nothing on Google, it can read as a minor spam signal on Bing, and it shows your keyword targets to anyone who views your source. Wasted effort with a small downside, which is reason enough to skip it.
The bakery owner did not need a new list of cakes. She needed those same words in her page title, her snippet, and her copy, where customers and Google both look. That is the quiet difference between busywork and getting found, and it is exactly the on-page work Fonzy handles for you, so you can put the words your customers search into the places that count without ever touching a line of code.
Do meta keywords work for SEO?
No, they do not. Google said directly in a 2009 Search Central post that it does not use the keywords meta tag in web search ranking, and that has not changed since. Bing goes further and treats the tag as a possible spam signal rather than any kind of boost. The words that actually move rankings belong in your page title, meta description, and visible page content instead.


Ready to grow?

