Short answer: No, not across the board. AI is redistributing traffic, not deleting it. Blog posts that just answer a factual question lose the most clicks, because that is exactly what an AI Overview does best. Local and transactional pages, like "electrician near me" and quote requests, stay nearly untouched.
You read a headline that said the web is dead, then you opened Google Analytics and saw a dip. That is a real and reasonable scare. But the dip is not spread evenly, and the difference between a page that fades and a page that holds is not luck. It is what the page is for.
Picture one electrician. She wrote a blog post a few years back called "how many amps does a dryer need." For a while it pulled in steady traffic. This year those clicks are drying up. On the same site, her "electrician near me" page and her "get a quote" form are performing about the same as ever. Same business, same site, two very different outcomes. That split is the whole story, and the 2026 data explains it.
Is AI actually taking clicks off the results page?
Yes, and there is a hard number on it. The Pew Research Center followed the real browsing of 900 U.S. adults across 68,879 searches in March 2025. When an AI summary appeared at the top of the results, people clicked a regular search-result link in only 8% of visits. Without a summary, they clicked in 15%. And when they did click a source cited inside the summary itself? Just 1% of visits.
So the search often ends before anyone reaches a website. The question got answered in place. About 18% of the searches in that study produced an AI summary, and that share keeps growing as Google, ChatGPT, and Perplexity all answer more questions directly.
Ahrefs put a second number on the same effect. Looking at 300,000 keywords and comparing December 2023 to December 2025, they found that the presence of an AI Overview lines up with a 58% lower click-through rate for the top-ranking page. The striking part is the trend: that drop was 34.5% back in April 2025. It nearly doubled in under a year. The pressure is not easing. It is building.
Which pages lose the most, and which barely feel it?
Here is where the electrician's two pages part ways.
The losers are informational and how-to posts that exist only to answer a factual question. "How many amps does a dryer need." "What temperature to proof bread." "How long does grout take to cure." These are the exact questions an AI Overview or a chatbot answers perfectly in one paragraph, so the click never happens. Seer Interactive measured this precisely across 3,119 informational search terms and 25.1 million organic impressions. For queries with an AI Overview, organic click-through rate fell from 1.76% in June 2024 to 0.61% in September 2025. Even queries without an AI Overview slid to 1.62%, a 41% drop. The whole informational category is under pressure, whether a summary shows on your query today or not.
Now the pages that hold. An AI can tell you how many amps a dryer needs. It cannot come to your house and wire your panel. The searcher who types "emergency electrician [town]" or "book an electrician near me" still has to reach a real business to get the job done. There is no summary that finishes that task for them. So local, near-me, booking, directions, and quote-request traffic sits in a different category entirely, and it stays roughly where it was.
That is the reframe most owners miss under the scary headlines. AI is best at ending searches it can fully answer. It is worst at ending searches where the customer still has to show up, pay, or book. Your traffic risk is not "do I have a website." It is "how much of my traffic is the kind AI can finish for the visitor." For a deeper look at that split, our guide on how customers find local businesses in 2026 walks through where the searches that still convert actually come from.
Should you brace for it to get worse?
Probably, on the informational side. Ryan Law, Director of Content Marketing at Ahrefs, said it plainly when the first numbers came out: "Assuming AI Overviews stay in this current form, this is also likely the highest the CTR will be. As the novelty wears off and the law of shitty clickthroughs kicks in, I would expect to see clicks reduce further." His own follow-up study then confirmed it, with the drop deepening from 34.5% to 58%.
Read that honestly. If your traffic depends on posts that answer factual questions, the trend is against you and it is worth planning around now. That is not doom, it is just the direction of travel. What it argues for is moving your effort toward the pages AI cannot finish, and toward being the source AI quotes. Both of those we will get to.
If you have already watched a specific post drop after an AI Overview appeared on its query, the recovery steps live in our piece on what to do when AI Overviews cut your traffic.
Is there an upside the headlines skip?
There is, and it is bigger than most owners realize.
First, AI is a growing traffic source, not only a leak. Similarweb tracked average monthly visits across generative-AI platforms and found them up 70% year over year, reaching 9.5 billion visits between June 2025 and May 2026. Some of those visits click through to real websites. Being recommended inside an AI answer makes a user 2.5 times more likely to visit that brand's site. The channel is still smaller than Google search, but it is climbing fast, and writing it off because it "looks small" is how you miss a channel while it is still cheap to win.
Second, the visitors AI does send are unusually good ones. Adobe studied more than a trillion visits to U.S. retail sites over the 2025 holiday season. Shoppers arriving from AI converted 31% more than other traffic sources, nearly double the rate from a year earlier. Revenue per visit was up 254%, and those visitors were 33% less likely to bounce immediately. The reason is simple: the AI already did the comparing and filtering, so the person who lands on your site is closer to buying. AI pre-qualifies them for you.
So the AI channel is small but growing, and it converts better than normal search. That is not the profile of a thing that is killing you. Our breakdown of whether ChatGPT actually sends traffic digs into that referral channel on its own.
How do you actually earn clicks from AI instead of losing them?
Be the source it cites. This is the part that flips the whole worry on its head.
Seer Interactive found that being cited inside an AI Overview earns 35% more organic clicks than not being cited at all, and 91% more paid clicks. Citation is the new front page. The old goal was to rank first. The new goal is to be the site the AI names when it gives its answer, because that name is a link, and people click it. The businesses getting quoted are pulling clicks out of the exact same summaries that are costing everyone else.
In practice, being cite-worthy means writing pages that give a clear, specific, correct answer that an AI can lift and attribute: real numbers, plain definitions, an obvious direct response near the top. It also means owning the queries AI cannot finish, the local and transactional ones, because that is where a click still has to happen. Our guide to getting cited by AI search lays out how to structure a page so it becomes the quoted source.
In the work we do for owner-run small businesses, the pattern is consistent enough to plan around. When an AI Overview lands on a broad factual query, the thin "answer the question" post on that topic is the first to fade, and it fades fast. The pages that keep pulling their weight are the ones tied to a real transaction the customer still has to complete: the service-area page, the booking page, the honest comparison a buyer reads right before they choose. Those hold because a summary cannot do the thing the visitor came to do.
What should you do Monday morning?
Four moves, in order of what pays off soonest.
Be the cited source. Make your key pages give a clean, specific answer up top so AI quotes you and sends the click, remembering Seer's 35% citation bump.
Own the queries AI cannot finish. Put your effort into local and transactional pages, "near me," "in [town]," "book," "quote," where the search cannot end without reaching you.
Capture the visitors you do get. Because AI-referred visitors convert 31% better (Adobe), a clear phone number, a simple booking form, and a fast page turn more of them into customers than they would from ordinary search.
Track the AI channel. Start watching AI referrals in your analytics now, while the numbers are small, so you can see the 70% growth curve on your own site instead of guessing.
And what not to do: do not panic-delete content, do not keep chasing factual keywords AI already owns, and do not ignore the AI channel because it looks small today. For the bigger picture on where all of this leaves a small business, our overview of SEO in 2026 for small businesses pulls the strategy together.
Frequently asked questions
Is AI killing all website traffic or just some of it?
Just some of it, and the split is sharp. Informational blog posts that answer a factual question lose the most, because AI summarizes them in place. Pew found people clicked a link in only 8% of visits when an AI summary appeared, versus 15% without. Local, booking, and quote-request pages stay nearly untouched, because a summary cannot complete the transaction for the customer.
Does AI send any real traffic to my site?
Yes, and it is growing fast. Similarweb measured generative-AI platform visits up 70% year over year to 9.5 billion. Those visitors also convert well: Adobe found AI referrals to retail sites converted 31% more than other sources over the 2025 holiday season. The channel is still smaller than Google search, but it is climbing and it converts.
Which of my pages are most at risk?
Any page whose only job is to answer a factual question a chatbot can answer in a sentence. "How many amps does a dryer need" is the classic example. Ahrefs found the top page loses about 58% of its clicks when an AI Overview shows. Pages tied to a real action the customer must take, booking, directions, getting a quote, are far safer.
If AI answers the question, why bother creating content at all?
Because being the source AI cites earns you more clicks, not fewer. Seer Interactive found citation inside an AI Overview brings 35% more organic clicks than not being cited. The goal shifts from ranking first to being the site AI names when it answers. Content that gives a clear, quotable answer still wins, it just wins differently.
AI is not deleting your traffic, it is sorting it. The factual posts you were slowly losing anyway will keep fading, and the local, booking, and quote pages that bring in actual customers will keep holding, as long as you feed them. Fonzy is built to do exactly that sorting for you: keep your pages worth quoting, keep the near-me and booking queries yours, and put your effort where the clicks still turn into customers.
Sources
- Pew Research Center: users clicked a link in 8% of visits with an AI summary versus 15% without
- Seer Interactive: informational CTR fell to 0.61%, but citation inside an AI Overview earns 35% more organic clicks
- Ahrefs: AI Overviews correlate with a 58% lower CTR for the top-ranking page, up from 34.5%
- Similarweb: generative-AI platform visits grew 70% year over year to 9.5 billion
- Adobe: AI referrals converted 31% more than other traffic over the 2025 holiday season


Ready to grow?

